Moral Skepticism
Someone who derives Moral Distinctions
For Hume distinction is based on feeling (can be backed up by the fact that every language has a word for right and wrong)

2 Moral Theories
1. Based on Reason
2. Based on Sentiments

Based on Reason
Rational Argument
Principles are the same to rational beings
Modern Philosophers

Based on Sentiments
Immediate feeling - internal sense
Similar to our perceptions of beauty and deformity (it just is)
Ancient Philosophers

<question>
Virtue

Natural vs Artificial
</question>
<answer>
Natural - Benevolence (ie kindness and sympathy)
Artificial/Conventional - Justice (ie property/$, is arbitrary!)


** both are useful and brings about good social well being/order
</answer>

What conditions give rise to Justice?
1. Lack of material good -  No justice, get what you can
2. Complete abundance - No justice, no need for it. 
3. State in between the first 2 - This is where justice is

Justice to Superstition
<answer>
Purity law (ie food), is arbitrary 
Justice, is arbitrary 

BUT is useful for creating order and well being (ie scenario or baseball player eating chicken sandwiches before a game)
</answer>

2 Criticisms (against Morality)
1. Skeptics 
2. Selfishness/Self Love

<question>
Skeptics

Argue that morality has been opposed on us by politicians in order to control us
</question>
<answer>
Hume Rejects this! In order for morality to manipulate us with morality, the moral sentiments must exist to be manipulated in the first place!

ie Dog pees on the rug. Can't manipulate dog not to pee on the rug by putting it on a guilt trip or using morality on it because these things don't exist in the dog, thus has no effect
</answer>

<question>
Selfishness/Self Love/Self Interest

Benevolence - see someone being benevolent and get agreeable feeling and we do it because it's beneficial to us
</question>
<answer>
Hume's response: It does appeal to sentiments, but there are cases where it doesn't seem to be for self interest

ie historical figure, if they have an agreeable virtue (or vice and disagreeable). But you don't know them and they don't affect you thus does not connect to your self interest. Same thing happens with fictional characters. 

ie chess opponents: are opponents but get agreeable feeling because of their skill even though its contrary to self interest.
</answer>