COMM Law and Ethics

Card Set Information

Author:
emily81r
ID:
112261
Filename:
COMM Law and Ethics
Updated:
2011-10-26 13:56:33
Tags:
Communication Laws
Folders:

Description:
Test 3
Show Answers:

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview

The flashcards below were created by user emily81r on FreezingBlue Flashcards. What would you like to do?


  1. Defamation
    •Causing harm to a person’s ‘fame’ or reputation through false statements (Black’s Law Dictionary)

    •Causing damage a person’s standing the community through attacks on character or professional ability. Middleton & Lee
  2. Tort in 50 States
    •Previously criminal:

    1) Sedition laws

    • 2) Defamation deemed likely to cause breach
    • of the peace.

    Both unconstitutional now. See NY Times v. Sullivan (re: sedition) (first amendment)

    and Ashton v. Kentucky, 1996 (re breach of the peace.) (unconstitutionally vague)
  3. Ashton vs. Kentucky
  4. Two forms of Defamation + define them
    • •Libel
    • – written or printed defamation

    • •Slander
    • – spoken defamation
  5. Who can be a plaintiff in a defamation suit?
    •A living person or organization who was the target of the bad statements

    •NOT units of government
  6. Elements of prima facie case for defamation, p. 99
    •defamatory statement

    •identification

    •publication

    •fault

    •falsity

    •personal harm
  7. List the elements for burden of proof
    • •defamatory statement
    • •identification
    • •publication
    • •fault
    • •falsity
    • •personal harm
  8. In Texas, the elements of a defamation claim are
    •publication of a statement;

    • •that
    • was defamatory concerning the plaintiff;

    • •with
    • the requisite degree of fault.

    • •WFAA-TV,
    • Inc. v. McLemore, 978
    • S.W.2d 568, 571 (Tex. 1998).
  9. Defamatory Statements: Restatement (2nd) or Torts
    •Statements that tend to expose a person to “hatred, ridicule or contempt.”

    •Statements that reflect unfavorably on one’s morality or integrity or that discredit a person in his or her occupation.
  10. Defamatory Statement cont'd:
    • •Statements that restrict a person’s social contacts by asserting that the individual has a mental illness, is unpatriotic, alcoholic, incompetent or
    • infected with a loathsome disease.
  11. Defamatory Statement Examples
    1.Statements suggesting criminal acts

    2.Statements claiming serious moral failing.

    3.Incompetence or dishonesty in business or profession

    4.Product libel – false disparagement (hard case, though – malice and lost sales requirement)
  12. Publication
    •Control of content is key

    • •“Common carriers” (telephone company, cell phone company, etc), no content control, therefore no
    • defamation liability.

    • •Ditto bookstores, and online bulletin board and discussion group operators. (The
    • latter by act of Congress. See text p. 115)
  13. Fault
    1. Generally none required before 1964 (depending on the state).

    2. Strict liability, generally speaking: publish defamation about plaintiff, become liable for Defamation.
  14. Fault now:
    •N.Y. Times v. Sullivan (1964): “public officials” (as plaintiffs) must prove actual malice (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of truth.)

    •Curtis Publishing Company v. Butts(1967) Ditto for “public figures”

    •Gertz v. Welch (1974) private plaintiffs must prove negligence.
  15. Definitions (Times and Curtis)
    • •“Public official” is an office holder or a government
    • employee responsible for policy making or for public funds, health or safety. New York Times

    • •“Public figure” is someone “intimately involved in the resolution of important public questions” or someone
    • “who by virtue of their fame, shapes events in areas of concern to society at large.” Curtis
  16. Two Types of "public figure" outlined in Gertz
    1.“All purpose.” People of positions of such power and influence that they are public figures for all purposes. Must always prove “malice” to win defamation case.

    2.“Limited” or “vortex.” People who “thrust themselves to the forefront of particular public controversy to influence” it. Only have to prove malice for falsehoods related to that controversy.
  17. Explanations and examples of All purpose public figures
    Someone of "widespread fame"

    A "celebrity" whose name is a "household word"

    Johnny Carson, William F. Buckley

    Reliance Insurance Co.,

    Carol Burnett, Jimmy Carteer, Colin Powell, Ted Turner

    These and other folks must always prove New York Times malice
  18. List all 3 Criteria for Limited Public Figures
    1) The alleged defamation involves a public controversy

    2) The person suing has voluntarily participated in that controversy

    3) The person suing has tried to affect the outcome and in doing so, the person must have obtained prominence and regular access to the media.
  19. Public Officials and Public Figures need to do what to win a libel suit?
    1) they must prove with "clear and convincing evidence" that the defendant published a defamatory statement with "knowledge of falsity" or with "reckless disregard for the truth". New York Times "actual malice."

    2) "actual malice" is much more than ill will or carelessness or "extreme departure" from common professional practices.
  20. Actual Malice (New York Times) - knowledge of falsity problems / examples
    Rare, hard to prove and usually takes evidence made up stuff, fabricated story

    Examples:

    Contrell, reporter fabricated an interview, invented quotes from a lady who wasn't home when he went to interview her.

    Goldwater, the plaintiff proved the publisher created false evidence, made up diagnoses, etc.
  21. Reckless disregard for the truth:
    High degree of awareness of probable falsity.

    Proof the defendant had serious doubts of truth plus ill will or hatred, reliance on highly questionable sources and failure to investigate.

    Open prejudice, ignoring denials and inconsistencies.

    Combo showing defendant published something only a reckless person who didn't care about the truth would print.
  22. Negligence
    Failure to act as a reasonable person would in similar circumstances.

    example: failure to do check subject, verify with the best available source, resolve conflict over what source said

    Must give a good faith effort to determine accuracy
  23. Examples of Negligence
    Note taking mistakes

    Failure to check facts

    Failure to contact defamed person

    Failure to verify info with easily accessible good source

    Unresolved disagreement between source and reporter over what was told to reporter

    Careless mistakes

    Reporter testimony regarding "standard of care."
  24. Damages - Types and Definitions
    • A. Compensatory damages - "to compensate"
    • 1. Actual damages - impairment of reputation and standing in community; humiliation, mental anguish and suffering.
    • 2. Special damages - lost income, etc.
    • B. Punitive Damages - "to punish" Always requires malice
  25. publication
    that the defamation was disseminated
  26. fault
    that the defamation was published as a result of negligence or recklessness
  27. falsity
    that the statement was false, a burden only for persons suing for defamation related to matters of public concern
  28. personal harm
    such as loss of reputation, emotional distress or loss of business revenues
  29. define common law malice
    intent to do harm
  30. define actual malice
    knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth

What would you like to do?

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview