NUTR 400 Part 2

Card Set Information

Author:
Rachau
ID:
115332
Filename:
NUTR 400 Part 2
Updated:
2011-11-08 00:34:45
Tags:
tag
Folders:

Description:
Validity and Reliability in Estimating Intake Methods of Estimating Nutritional intake
Show Answers:

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview

The flashcards below were created by user Rachau on FreezingBlue Flashcards. What would you like to do?


  1. What variables are there when choosing what method to use to estimate dietary intake? (4)
    • -whether you want information about dietary
    • behaviours or amounts of foods, nutrients, and nonnutrient
    • food constituents consumed
    • - whether you want to assess absolute or relative
    • amounts of foods and/or nutrients
    • - whether you want historical or current patterns
    • - time, resources, money etc that you hav4e
  2. What are the methods of estimating usual dietary intake? (4)
    • Food Frequency Questionaire
    • 24Hour Recall
    • Food Record
    • Direct Observation
  3. What are considered short term instruments? When are the most used?
    • - 24hr recall, food records, food diaries
    • - Oftern used in population surverys for monitoring health and nutrition
  4. What are considered long term instruments? When are the most used?
    • - FFQ
    • -Often used in large cohort or case control studies to examine die health relationships
  5. What are some variable approached to using fooddiaries/ records? (4)
    • - Trained or untrained respondents
    • - Detailed review or not
    • - Highly standardized coding rules or not
    • - Development of electronic methods: PDA, cell
    • phones
  6. What the strengths of food diaries/ records?(4)
    • - Intake is quantified, detailed
    • - Can include weekends
    • - Could be relatively accurate (detail/training)
    • - Data are rich in details (Nutrient, Cooking practices, Meal and eating frequency)
  7. What the limitations of food diaries/ records?(7)
    • -Recording influences diet (reactive tool)- Biased measurement
    • - Requires literacy
    • - High respondent and investigator burden
    • - Multiple days required to estimate usual intake
    • - Sample selection bias
    • - Completion worse over time
    • - Underreporting is typical- Worse with overweight/obese
  8. What is a 24 Hour Recall?
    • -Ascertain descriptions and amounts of foods consumed
    • in 24 hour period prior to interview
    • - Can be interviewer administered or self-administered by computer (US National Cancer Institute is developing a
    • web-based tool;
  9. What are some variable approached to using 24 hour recalls? (8)
    • -Training of interviewers
    • - Standardization of probing questions
    • - Multiple passes through the day
    • - Computer vs. paper/pencil administration
    • - In-person vs. telephone
    • - Portion size models or measurement aids
    • - Quality and completeness of nutrient database
    • -Development of self-administered automated
    • -5 systems administered via computer or internet
  10. What the strengths of 24 hour recalls?(6)
    • -low respondent burden and high compliance- less
    • chance of selection bias due to burden
    • - can be suitable for illiterate subjects
    • - standardised protocol can be used
    • - unlikely to interfere with dietary behaviour
    • - can get through relatively large numbers of subjects in
    • one day
    • ! can get details on cooking practises, brands, meal
    • frequency etc.
  11. What the limitationss of 24 hour recalls?(6)
    • -Imperfect knowledge and memory- relies on this
    • - Relies heavily on getting a portion size estimation
    • - Multiple days required to estimate usual intake- single day is a snap-shot
    • - Costly to administer if face-to face- Highly trained interviewers
    • - Some evidence that reporting declines with multiple administrations
    • - Underreporting is typical- Worse with overweight/obese
  12. Disadvantages of 24 hour recalls (3)
    • - relies heavily on memory
    • - portion size estimation issues
    • - a single 24 hour recall only gives a snapshot of that
    • persons intake
    • (simply having a bad day cannot be used to make judgements that person likely nutrition status
  13. What are some variable approached to using FFQ? (8)
    • - Number of foods, clarity of questions
    • - Portion size questions: pictures vs. text description
    • - Time frame
    • - Development of food list, nutrient database
    • - Type of administration: computer vs. paper
    • - Specificity to population of interest
    • - Supplement intake
    • - Food preparation
  14. FFQ Strengths (4)
    • -Can assess intakes of very large numbers of people
    • (can be distributed/collected by mail and self
    • administered)
    • -Atempts to estimate 'usual' individual intake of foods with one administration
    • - Does not affect eating behavior-
    • -Lower cost of administering/processing-optic-readable scanned forms and Computer-generated data
  15. FFQ: limitations (8)
    • - Lack details ( finite food list, details of cookin methods, specific food type lost
    • -Cognitively complex
    • - Requires literacy
    • - Affected by recent diet
    • - Severe measurement error: prone to bias
    • - Different FFQs can behave quite differently-FFQ designed to
    • assess calcium intake is NOT appropriate if you want to
    • measure intakes of fruit and vegetables
    • - Different populations respond differently
    • -Problems with assessing foods
  16. How to assess a FFQ? (4)
    • 1. What was the original purpose of the
    • questionnaire?
    • 2. Who was the target population? Are
    • questionnaires developed in Europe suitable for
    • use in Canada?
    • 3. When was the questionnaire developed? Are the
    • foods and portion sizes still relevant?
    • 4. Has a previous validation been carried out, was it acceptable
  17. How to analyze food records/recalls?
    What questions/ limts are there with this method of analysis?
    • Databases ( USDA, CANDI)
    • Questions:
    • Foods away from home?
    • Foods prepared at home?
    • Fortified/enriched foods?
    • How good is it at accurately determining nutrients?
    • Updating of the systerm with changes to food supply?
    • New food compound of health interest?
    • Supplement use?
  18. When reading literature what consideration should you make when analyzing food estimation? (3)
    • - What database was used?
    • - Are valid estimates possible - intake data collected to obtain a reliable and valid estimate of food in the population of interest., completion of the database
    • -Is the correction level of precision reported
  19. How are dietary patterns measured?
    • - Used to assess dietary intake (food records, FFQ)
    • for case-control, survey & cohort studies
    • - Cluster, Factor or Index analysis
    • - Cluster & Factor determine patterns from collected
    • food intake
    • - Indexes are pre-determined based on definition of
    • healthy eating
    • - Healthy Eating Index, Dietary Quality Index,
    • Alternate Healthy Eating Index
    • -limitations in using these?
  20. What are the limitations of biomarkers used in nutrition studies?
    • -Very few short term available, few long term
    • EXAMPLES: see readings
    • - Concentration: reflect the biological response to intake - Cannot be used to assess amount consumed, Correlate to amount consumed, May reflect short or long term intakes, Some are appropriate for risk assessment
    • -Most nutrients tightly controlled: no relationship to intake
  21. What are some innovations in estimating intake (5)
    • -Web-based, automated FFQs
    • - Self-administered, automated, web-based,
    • 24-hour dietary recalls
    • - Real time data collection of food records
    • - Voice recognition software
    • - Combining methods: FFQ with 24-hour recalls
  22. What is External Validity?
    How is it increased? (2)
    • study design)- extent to which results from a study can be extended to universe that is broader than population
    • studied.
    • Increased by:
    • a) subject selection - random selection, differences in confounding recruitment methods (including incentives)
    • b) subject number - sufficient statistical poer to detect differences between groups

    • -- Still need quality control of measures and judgment
    • about degree to which results can be extrapolated
  23. What is internal Validity?
    • adequacy of measurement - how well does it measure what it is intended to measure (index or indicator reflects what it is intended to
    • measure)
  24. Components of internal validity (4) and how they are affected
    • 1) Reliability (reproducibility)- Degree to which repeated measures give same value
    • -Affected by:
    • a) True variation in the measurement
    • b) Random error (or random variation)
    • c) Systematic errors
    • 2) Face Validity - judgment (often by experts) that tool measures what it is supposed to
    • 3) Content Validity - are all components of the
    • construct (e.g. diet) measured by the tool?
    • 4) Criterion validity - how well the tool performs
    • compared with another tool (gold standard?) known
    • to measure the same thing?
  25. How to ensure internal validity? (4)
    • 1) Reliability
    • - Standardize protocols; calibrate instruments
    • - Use protocols suitable for situation
    • - Include test-retest as part of study design
    • 2) Get expert opinion before implementing tool
    • 3) Conceptualize content of construct and choose tools accordingly (e.g. based on literature)
    • 4) Compare between and among tools
  26. When does changing a tool change the validity of your measures? How might you minimize the likelihood that changed to you method have been invalidates** EXAM
    - How to make you tools still useful
  27. What is a confounding variable?
    How can you control this? (2)
    A special type of bias (therefore affects validity)1 A characteristic or variable that is distributed differently in the study and control groups, and affects the outcome being assessed. Eg. (Randomization, stratification)

    • Ways to control
    • 1) study design - randomization, stratificaton, recruitment restirction, matching
    • 2) Post Data Collection - stratification (in analysis) - multivariate analysis
  28. Validity measures diary /food record (2)
    • -complete and accurate record of all food consumed, where the choice of food consumed has not been influenced by the act of recording
    • Valid FFQ
    • - accurate reflection of typical food intake over
    • a designated period of time - undistorted by false memory or desire to appear "norma"
  29. What is a measuresment error?
    Difference between the true value and the value obtained from a measurem
  30. What is a systematic error (bias)?
    What is negative bias and positive bias?
    -Source of error in which measurements consistently depart from the true values ( if a instrument has a systematic error then the average of many repeat measures does not approximate the true value)

    • Bias is either negative or positive
    • 1)Negative bias - means that dietary intakes are
    • systematically under-estimated
    • 2) Positive bias - means that dietary intakes are
    • systematically over-estimated

    • Eg. Doubly labelled water studies suggest that obese
    • people are likely to systematically under-report
    • energy intake
  31. What is Random Error (5)?
    • -Unpredictable error
    • affects reproducibility (or precision) of a method
    • - caused by true variation in intake + measurement error
    • - reduces the strength of associations observed between diet and markers for disease
    • - reduces the statistical power of studies
  32. What is precision?
    How valid it is in nutrition studies
    • The ability of a measurement to be reproduced - i.e.
    • produces the same answer on repeat administrations

    • -Almost impossible to achieve at the individual level food intake varies widely over time
    • i.e. if you did 24 hour recalls on 1 person on 4
    • different occasions, you would be unlikely to get
    • exactly the same energy and nutrient intakes on each
    • occasion
  33. What are the major sources of measurements of error (9)
    • 1) Respondent error: either random or systematic
    • OR inability/unwillingness to comply with protocols
    • 2) Interviewer bias:
    • - Monday interview vs friday, interviewers with desires to promote healthy eating may obtain biased results, interviewed may not click with certain individuals but have very good rapport with others
    • 3) Respondent memory lapses
    • -use memory aids (e.g. food models, photographs)
    • - not such a big problem if the time period between food intake and recall of the intake is short
    • - foods contributing to the main part of the meal are remembered better than minor or odd foods
    • 4) Incorrect estimation of portion size
    • - probably a large source of measurement error
    • -using average portion weight instead of a estimate can result in substantial error
    • 5) Honest vs desirable responses
    • 6) Foods served vs foods consumed
    • 7) Subject characteristics (obesity, age,
    • motivation, etc)
  34. What influences random (1) and systematic errors (3)
    • Random error- within person error
    • Systematic error- Person-specific bias
    • - Constant additive error
    • - Intake-related bias
  35. How can you get coding and computation errors (4)
  36. - Can arise from poor descriptions of foods
    • - Inaccurate conversion from estimates or household measures to actual weights
    • - May not have appropriate tables for food composition data
    • - Systematic mistakes when entering data - e.g. entering data - eg. orange juice as concentrated OJ can result in vitamin C estimates 5x greater than they should be

What would you like to do?

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview