The flashcards below were created by user
Exam8
on FreezingBlue Flashcards.
Credibility vs time shifting parameters
When there are shifting param over time, older years of data should be given substantially less cred than more recent years. There may be only a minimal gain in efficiency from using add'l yrs of data.
Testing for shifting parameters over time
Chi-square: |actual - exp|^{2}/exp, df = n - 1
Interpretation: x% chance diff obs from same distribution
Avg Correlation btwn pair of yrs
Interpretation: look if evolves or not over time
Simple methods to derive new estimate
all weight in mean (Z = 0)
all weight in latest data (Z = 1)
X = ZY_{1} + (1 - Z)Y_{2}
X = (Z/M)ΣY_{i} + (1-Z)M
Note: A simplification of a general method is equal or inferior
General methods to derive new estimate
goal is to reflect the fact that most recent yrs have more value
least square error: smaller the better; max = 75% of prev
small chance of large error: minimize prob
Meyers/Dorweiler: correlation btwn (actual/exp) and (pred/avg) → look for evidence that there's no pattern suggesting that larger predictions lead to larger errors
First 2 methods minimize large errors; 3rd concerned w pattern of error
Variance of Data
between variance: var between risks
within variace = process var excl shift param + due to s.p.
Mahler's approach: baseball vs insurance
constant set of risks over the period
data is accurate & final
same amount of exposure
grand mean is fixed
Credibility of delayed data
Mahler shows that using delayed data substantially increases the squared arror btwn pred & obs. In particular, incr btwn 1 & 2 yrs of separation is dramatic.