Evidence - relevance

Card Set Information

Author:
luwhat
ID:
221228
Filename:
Evidence - relevance
Updated:
2013-05-26 16:05:04
Tags:
Evidence relevance
Folders:

Description:
Evidence - relevance
Show Answers:

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview

The flashcards below were created by user luwhat on FreezingBlue Flashcards. What would you like to do?


  1. Relevance is not legally defined, it is decided by common sense and experience on the facts of the case
    Randall
  2. Evidence implicating someone else was not evidence relevant to D's guilt
    Blastland
  3. Large quantity of cash in drugs case
    Guney - relevant ONLY as evidence to show that D knew the drugs were in his possession (the cash was in the same place)
  4. Guidance on cash/lifestyle cases
    Wright - evidence of cash or lifestyle is only relevant when proving a specific matter in issue. If it will lead the jury to think propensity, it will be prejudicial and should not be admitted unless it can go through as bad character evidence

What would you like to do?

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview