Attacking Truthfulness of Witness: reputation/opinion/specific acts allowed? EE allowed?
Reputation/Opinion Evidence to a witnesses character for truthfulness.
EE allowed (if relevant to truth/untruth)
Specific Instances of Conduct allowed if PV of truth/untruth
CANNOT be used to attack on a collateral matter
On CX, can ask about specific instances regarding
1. Witness truth/untruth
2. Another Ws truth/untruth about whom this witness is testifying
Impeachment by Contradiction
EE inadmissible to impeach witness on a collateral matter.
Collateral matter is something that is immaterial to the issues in the case and says nothing about credibility, except just to contradict the witness.
Witness testifies he saw the crime while coming home from his grandma. Def cannot call witnesses to testify that the witness really visited his mistress. [but you can still cross on this issue]
Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statement:
BOTH- If offered ONLY to impeach, prior inconsistent stmt of witness not hearsay, admissible [not offered for its truth, but 403 prejudice problem!]
If used to prove truth of facts asserted in the statement:
Fed: if PIS was given under oath at another trial or deposition, its not hearsay [exemption, admissible for its truth]; otherwise is hearsay and inadmissible. Limiting instr. needed so that jury only considers the statement for impeachment, not for truth of the matter asserted.
Cal: hearsay, but admissible under a hearsay exception which allows all inconsistent statements of the witness, whether or not under oath, to be admitted for both purposes
EE of PIS inadmissible to impeach on a collateral matter, even if it was given at another trial or deposition [e.g., transcript not admissible]
EE of PIS admissible only if witness given opportunity to explain/deny [cross-exam, recall witness]. So, if there is no cross exam and the witness has been excused [cannot be recalled], EE of a prior inconsistent statement would be inadmissible.
Impeachment with Bias, Interest, Motive
On CX, EE is permitted to show bias interest or motive.
Foundation requirement: Only admissible of you give the witness an opportunity to explain or deny.
Impeachment with Prior Convictions for Crime Involving False Statement:
FRE: all convictions (felonies and misdemeanors) involving false statement (perjury, forgery, fraud) are admissible no balancing allowed except for OLD convictions [but could give limiting instr.]
Cal: all felonies involving moral turpitude (lying, violence, theft, extreme recklessness, sexual misconduct, but not negligent or unintentional acts) are admissible, but the court MUST balance. All other felonies are inadmissible (Prop. 8 does not change this)
Impeachment with Prior Convictions for Crime Not Involving False Stmt
FRE: Felonies not involving false stmt (murder, robbery, rape) may be admissible to impeach, but court MUST balance (exclude if PE >> PV). Misdemeanors that dont involve false stmts are NOT admissible to impeach.
Cal: all felonies involving moral turpitude (lying, violence, theft, extreme recklessness, sexual misconduct, but not for negligent or unintentional acts) are admissible, but the court MUST balance. All other felonies are inadmissible (Prop. 8 does not change this)
Impeachment with Prior Misdemeanor Convictions
FRE: all misdemeanors involving false stmts admissible, with no balancing (except for old convictions). All other misdemeanors NOT admissible to impeach
Cal: Under CEC, all misdemeanors inadmissible to impeach but Prop 8 allows admission in a criminal case if the crime involves moral turpitude, but is subject to balancing. (But misdemeanors still inadmissible in all civil cases)
If conviction is admissible, EE can be used under both Fed and Cal law.
Convictions more than 10 years old
Fed: It is inadmissible unless probative value outweighs unfair prejudice (this is an inverse balancing test skewed in favor of the defendant, burden on non-objecting party)
Cal: No specific rules, but California always has the power to balance; age of the conviction is a factor to consider in the balancing (the older the conviction, the lower the PV, burden on obj. party)
If the conviction is admissible, EE can be used under Fed and Cal
Can a conviction be proved with extrinsic evidence?
If the conviction is otherwise admissible under the above rules for impeachment, the conviction may be proved with extrinsic evidence.
Acts of misconduct (not convictions)
FRE: admissible in civil or criminal cases only if an act of lying (simply dishonest misconduct is not enough!). EE not admissible to impeach, can only ask witness about itin good faith, but youre stuck with the answer
Cal: Inadmissible under CEC; Under Prop 8, potentially admissible in criminal cases if act of moral turpitude, but the courts can always balance unfair prejudice against probative value. EE is also permitted.
Impeachment by Reputation and Opinion regarding truthfulness
Under both Cal and Fed law, you can admit opinion evidence if it has to do with truthfulness. There is no limit on EE. But it must be about the truthfulness of the defendant