-
Critical thinking and scientific research
scientific research requires critical thinking; curiosity, skepticism, questioning
-
critical thinking
assessing claims, making judgements, based well-supported evidence
-
4 main goals of psychological research
1. to DESCRIBE behavior and mental processes; 2. to make accurate PREDICTIONS about them; 3. to demonstrate some CONTROL over them; 4. to EXPLAIN how and why behavior and mental processes occur
-
Steps in Scientific Investigation
1. Define the problem; 2. formulate the hypothesis; 3. Select a research method and design the study; 4. Select your subjects/conduct study; 5. Analyze the data; 6. Write up the results
-
Define the problem
step 1; what are you trying to find out? MUST BE IN THE FORM OF A QUESTION; ex: Does heart rate increase with watching violent movies?
-
Problem questions come from
observations, curiosity, past research (readings), skepticism, theories, and other studies of folklore
-
Formulate the hypothesis
step 2; educated guess; a specific prediction about some phenomenon; a testable prediction; "statement of the expected relationship between the variables of interest"; what we think will happen; Ex: If someone watches a violent movie, then they will have a higher heart rate than those who dont.
-
operational definition of variables (operationalize)
exact operations or methods used; variables in terms that they can be observed and measured; amount of something used, way something's measured
-
Select a Method/Design the Study
test your hypothesis; five basic methods: experimental method, correlational method, survey method, ___, ___
-
Experimental method (experiment)
a controlled means of studying the relationship between the variables of interest; two variables: independent and dependent
-
independent variable
the variable the experimenter changes or manipulates
-
dependent variable
the response or results variable; subject's response; what was measured
-
Easy way to ID independent/dependent variables
"The effects of ______(independent) on ______(dependent)."
-
Extraneous variables or confounds
things that could impact the findings (or dependent variable) other than the independent variable; want to hold these variables constant
-
Negating extraneous variables
random assignment (or randomizing); each subject has an equal chance of being in either an experimental or control group; distribute confounding (extraneous) variables across groups (equally); minimizing chance of distorted/biased results; RANDOM ASSIGNMENT
-
random assignment
one means of control; establishes cause and effect; randomly assign groups to independent variable
-
experimental group
receives the independent variable/treatment; How does the independent variable affect them?; participant group
-
control group
receives everything the experimental group receives except the independent variable/no treatment; may receive a placebo; comparison group
-
Advantage to research method
control; cause and effect
-
Disadvantage to research method
can't manipulate everything; ethical concerns;
-
Correlational Method
means of studying the magnitude and direction of the relationship between the variables of interest; measure the variables and plot them to determine the relationship; use a statistic to determine the strength (magnitude) and direction of the relationship
-
correlation coefficient
between +1.00 and -1.00; closest to either = strong correlation; closest to 0 = weak or no correlation
-
Correlational variables
no real independent and dependent variable; usually called grouping, categorical or classification variables; may still be referred to as independent and dependent variables
-
Three types of correlations
positive, negative and no correlation
-
positive correlation
as one variable of interest increases, the other variable of interest increases; change in same direction
-
negative correlation
as one variable of interest increases, the other variable of interest decreases
-
no correlation
there is no relationship between the variables of interest; correlation coefficient closer to .00
-
Advantages of correlational methods
testing predictions; evaluating theories
-
Disadvantages of correlational methods
two-way causality (bi-directionality problem), third variable problem
-
Two-way causality (bi-directional problem)
can't establish causality
-
Third variable problem
may be an artificial relationship; changes in two variables may be due to another variable
-
Survey Method
information is obtained by asking many people a standard set of questions; ask about attitudes, opinions and behaviors; self-report measures; polling/questionnaire (written survey); interview (oral survey)
-
Advantages of survey method
gathers large amounts of data; quick; inexpensive
-
Disadvantages of survey method
poorly phrased questions; response biases (social desirability)
|
|