employment law

Home > Preview

The flashcards below were created by user yhliuaa on FreezingBlue Flashcards.

  1. Distinction between employee V contractor
  2. tests to distinguish whether employment relationship exists
  3. Multi-factor Test
  4. Continuous Contract


  5. Employer’s common law duties


  6. Employee’s common law duties


  7. Important implied terms in E.O.


  8. Termination by choice


  9. Summary dismissal


  10. Constructive dismissal


  11. If an employee fails to go to work on time, can the employer dismiss him without any compensation?


  12. An accountant, Mary, entered into an employment contract with her accounting firm. According to the terms of employment, Mary was not allowed to work as an accountant for 3 years in Central after termination of the employment(restraint of trade clause) or solicit business from the former accounting firm customers. One month after leaving the firm, Mary worked as a senior accountant for another accounting firm in Central. Her former employer wants to sue Mary for breach of employment contract. Advise Mary of her position.


  13. Carol is employed as a clerk by a firm of accountants. She is approached by George, a garage owner, who asks Carol if she will do his bookkeeping in her spare time. Explain whether Carol will be breaking her contract of employment if she accepts this offer.


  14. After a heated argument, Mr. Bean resigned and set up his own business having recruited a number of Mr. Cox’s salespersons. Before leaving they had all familiarized themselves with such things as customer lists, pricing structures and delivery routes. Mr. Cox’s business suffered dramatically and he decided to sue Mr. Bean and the others for breach of contract. He contended that it was a term of all employment contracts that they would not take with them vital secrets and work in direct competition after termination their employment. Although nothing had been expressly included in their original contracts, Cox argued that it was implied by law. Advise Mr. Cox and his former employees of their respective legal positions.


  15. Tony is employed as a teacher by Sunny High School. Due to the extreme tightness of the scheduling at examination times, Tony, along with many other members of staff, has to work both evenings and weekends to ensure that all the examination scripts are marked in time for the requisite Examination Board meetings. This particular year, Tony and a few other staff have refused to work evenings and weekends marking the scripts, because of the pressure this causes to their families. This refusal has led to a disruption to the Examination Board meeting schedule and to the School as a whole. The School has now responded by consulting your firm of solicitors as to whether it can deduct a percentage of these teachers’ wages for their action or even refuse to pay them any wages at all. The teachers involved have refused to sign an undertaking to the School that they will not take such action again in the future. Advise Sunny High School.


  16. Rita was the machine shop floor supervisor. She was dismissed when she missed a shift because she was visiting her sick mother in hospital. After an internal appeal, she was reinstated at a lower grade, with a consequent reduction in salary, after consideration had been given to the fact that: a) she had been worked there for 15 years; b) she had an exemplary work record; and c) she had arranged for another supervisor to cover her shift and no disruption to the business occurred. Rita resigned after the appeal. Mavis worked on the shop floor for five years. Due to foreign imports, ABC had been striving to produce more products in less time and the workers were ignoring safety procedures-such as fencing machinery-to meet targets ABC had set. Mavis refused to remove the fence on her machine and therefore could not work as quickly as the others. ABC warned her that if she could not meet her targets by removing the fence, he would reduce her wages. Because of the stress placed upon her, she resigned. Advise Rita and Mavis.


  17. B and L work for the ABC Company. B took a week off work without permission and without telling his manager the reasons for his absence. In fact, B’s wife had left him. He has worked for the fir for 20 years but of late has shown little interest in his job. The manager told him yesterday that, because of his attitude, he was being taken off his job as supervisor and put back to working the machinery. B told his manager to ‘stuff” his job and left saying ‘See you in court.’ L was employed as a sales representative for 10 years. He was employed under a contract which required him to work 35 hours a week. Two weeks ago, on 1 April, the company announced that it will require all sales representatives to work up to five hours a week compulsory overtime from 1 May. Staffs were not consulted about this change. Although most of the sales representatives have accepted this change, L has refused to do so and has resigned with effect from 30 April. ABC has introduced the change because of an anticipate increase in competition. Advise B and L.


Card Set Information

employment law
2014-12-07 06:04:08
employment law

employment law
Show Answers:

What would you like to do?

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview