* Defense counsel for purposes of the Sixth Amendment with effective assistance of counsel.
When an officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, intentionally terminate or restrain a persons freedom of movement.
Test: whether a reasonable person would feel free to disregard the officer.
A police officer can stop an individual when the officer has a reasonable suspicion based on articulable facts to believe that a crime has occurred and this suspect was involved.
A police office can frisk a suspect for weapons (safety), but cannot search for evidence.
If the officer can identify obvious contraband, the office can seize the object.
Findings during a Terry stop can blossom into probable cause which then allows for arrest.
Officers may pat down a suspect, and do not need reasonable suspicion with checkpoints.
Require probable cause to believe that the arrested individual has committed the crime.
May be done with or without a warrant.
If police have probable cause to believe an individual has committed a crime, the police may arrest that individual on the basis of a hunch that another crime was involved.
(1) Issued by a neutral and detached magistrate
(2) based upon the finding of probable cause
(3) that the named individual has committed a particular crime.
The warrant must name a person and identify the person.
MD: warrant must be returned to the court.
Arrest warrant allow you to....
Arrest the named person
Enter a home to arrest the named person
Felony - In or outside officer's presence with probable cause.
Misdemeanor - In the officer's presence with probable cause.
Search Incident to Arrest
Lawful arrest warrant allows the arresting officers to make a contemporaneous search of the person arrest and the immediate area to protect officer/public safety and to prevent destruction of evidence.
Any evidence discovered during this type of search can be used against the person arrested.
Search incident to arrest on the street
Search incident to arrest at home
suspect and his immediate area.
Search incident to arrest in car
Passenger compartment of the vehicle so long as suspect still has access to the vehicle at that time.
When police arrest a driver and impound his car, it may be searched for inventory purposes.
If arrest is illegal, this evidence should be excluded.
When government conduct violates a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Reasonable expectation of privacy
(2) hotel rooms,
(4) curtilage, such as the backyard of your home, and
(5) in luggage.
(1) issuance by neutral and detached magistrate,
(2) based upon probable cause to believe that the items sought are fruits/instrumentalities/evidence of the crime, and
(3) must describe the place and property to be searched with particularity.
Warrantless Searches: Exigent Circumstances
To secure premises while they obtain a warrant.
Warrantless Searches: Search Incident to Arrest
Warrant unnecessary for searches when incident to a lawful arrest.
Scope must be appropriate
Warrantless Searches: Consent
A suspect can consent to a search.
An officer is not required to explain the right to refuse to the search.
A third party with apparent authority can consent to a search.
An officer cannot search over a present occupant's objection and use the evidence against him.
Warrantless Searches: Automobiles
If police have probable cause to believe an automobile contains contraband, they can search those parts of the vehicle and containers inside which could contain that contraband. They cannot search other areas or containers.
Warrantless Searches: Plain View
If police are legally on the premises, they can seize any item in plain view or plain smell, even if the item was not named in the warrant.
Warrantless Searches: Evidence Obtained From Administrative Searches
Police do not require warrants to conduct administrative searches.
Searches for non-investigatory purposes.
Warrantless Searches: Stop and Frisk
Search of a suspect for police officers safety when there is a reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot and the suspect is involved.
MD: Warrantless Searches - Community Care Functions
When police are acting as caretakers of the community, safeguarding property and persons.
MD: Warrantless Searches - wiretapping
Special type of warrant required
MD: Warrantless Arrest and Misdemeanors
If a crime was a misdemeanor and the crime was not committed in the officers presence, a warrantless arrest is valid for certain types of crimes and under certain conditions.
Type of crime: (1) Vehicular manslaughter, (2) malicious burning, (3) malicious mischief, (4) theft under $1,000, (5) indecent exposure, (6) possession of drugs, (7) possession of handguns and other concealed weapons, or (8) prostitution.
Certain conditions: (1) suspect will not otherwise be apprehended, (2) without arrest, suspect will cause physical injury or damage to others, and (3) suspect will destroy evidence of the crime.
No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. 5th Amendment.
Scope of 5th Amendment Privilege against Incrimination
Natural persons only, not corporations or unions.
Testimonial evidence only, not physical evidence.
Applicable to testimony that would be incriminating links in the chain, evidence that is likely to lead to prosecution and conviction.
Can be invoked in any proceeding as long as there is reason to believe testimony might lead to future criminal prosecution.
If immunity is given, this right cannot be invoked.
Statements Made By an Individual (5th Am)
Statements must be made to the police or a government agent.
Statements made as a result of custodial interrogation are inadmissible unless they are accompanied by procedural safeguards.
Right to remain silent, statements may be used against her in court, right to consult an attorney and have attorney present during questioning, and right to an attorney appointed if she cant be afforded.
No magic words.
When Miranda is invoked:
Police must cease questioning if the suspect.
After a substantial period of time, police can go back to the suspects, Mirandize again and talk to suspect.
Police must cease questioning if the suspect affirmatively invokes the right to counsel. Questioning can re-start when (1) counsel is present, or (2) defendant re-initiates contact with the police.
Miranda Interrogation Tactics
Confessions - voluntary.
Threats of harm - not allowed.
Deceit - permitted.
Consequences of 5th Amendment Violations: Involuntarily Obtained Statements
Never admissible, and subsequent evidence is excluded as the fruit of the poisonous tree.
To overturn conviction, the court applies the harmless error standard.
Consequences of 5th Amendment Violations: Miranda Violations
Admission is suppressed, but may admitted for impeachment purposes to challenge the credibility of the defendant.
Evidence obtained as a result of a voluntary statement in violation of Miranda is admissible.
Defendants Right to Counsel
The 6th Amendment explicitly provides a criminal defendant with the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Automatically attaches upon indictment, but is dependent upon the offense (a suspect might not have right to counsel for unrelated charges, and can be questioned expressly or through undercover means).
Applies regardless of custody.
Defendants Right to Counsel: When Applicable
To all critical stages of the prosecution.
Hearings, post-indictment lineups, post-indictment interrogations, all parts of the trial.
Non-critical stages are investigative lineups, photo arrays, discretionary appeals and post-convictions proceedings like habeas corpus.
Where the police will try to have a witness identify the suspect. Cannot be impermissibly suggestive.
Photo arrays: neither the defendant nor his lawyer has the right to be present for viewings of photo arrays, but the arrays must be given to the defendant.
Defendant has no right to counsel in pre-indictment lineups, but she does have the right to counsel in post-indictment lineups. If violated, the evidence must be excluded.
Admissibility of Identification
Cannot be overly suggestive if lineup evidence is used at trial otherwise, excluded.
If overly suggestive, an identification may be permitted when
Clear and convincing evidence that the witness would have identified the defendant even without the suggestive lineup.
Exclusionary rule - Standing to Invoke
The violation must have been the defendants rights, not someone elses, except for defendants who were passengers in a car.
The Exclusionary Rule
Evidence obtained in violation of the 4th, 5th or 6th Amendments cannot be introduced at trial to prove a defendants guilt.
The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine applies the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained as a result of the initial violation.
If evidence would have been discovered anyways through lawful means, the exclusionary rule will not be applied.
Exclusionary Rule Exceptions - Independent Source
Relevant evidence discovered on the basis of an independent source will be admissible.
Exclusionary Rule Exceptions - Attenuation in the Causal Chain
Intervening events and the passage of time can remove the taint.
Exclusionary Rule Exceptions - Good Faith
A police officer who relies on either (1) an existing law that was later declared unconstitutional or (2) a warrant that, while facially valid, is later found to be defective, the evidence she discovers will not be inadmissible.
Officers can rely on a warrant as long as warrant was (1) not obtained by fraud, (2) not defective on its face, and (3) magistrate did not wholly abandon his judicial role.
By law enforcement personnel does not necessarily trigger the exclusionary rule.
What is not isolated? Deliberate, reckless, intentional, recurring or systemic.
MD: Timing for motion to suppress
Within 30 days of the initial appearance, a pretrial motion to suppress should be filed.
Within 30 days of entry of appearance, a pretrial motion to suppress should be filed. Within 5 days after receiving discovery.
Initiation of Charges - Federal
All federal felony charges must be initiated by grand jury indictment unless the defendant waives the indictment.
Indictment claims that there is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the crimes charged.
Initiation of Charges - States
Presentment Clause has not been incorporated on the states.
Option of proceeding by information, but the defendant is entitled to a preliminary hearing before a neutral magistrate to determine probable cause.
MD: There is a right to an attorney at bail hearings this is a critical stage where the attorney is necessary because an individual can be detained.
Proceedings before a Grand Jury
Grand juries can consider hearsay/excludable evidence in deciding to indict.
Prosecutors have no duty to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury.
Defendants do not have the right to appear before the grand jury or present witnesses.
Witnesses do not have the right to counsel within grand jury room, although they can leave the grand jury room to consult with their lawyers.
Grand jury proceedings are secret, and the grand jury need not be unanimous.
Someone goes to court commissioner who charges the defendant.
Generally done for misdemeanors, but can be done for felony charges.
Requires a probable cause determination that the crime actually occurred.
MD: Criminal Information
A prosecutor makes his own determination that a crime has occurred.
Filed district/circuit court.
If in circuit court, preliminary hearing.
If in district court, no review.
MD: Grand Jury Indictment
24 people make a determination whether there is probable cause that the defendant committed a crime.
No review of this determination.
Defendants Competence to Stand Trial
Whether the defendant comprehends the nature of the proceedings against him and can assist his lawyer in defending the case.
If defendant is competent to stand trial, he is also competent to waive the right to trial and plead guilty.
MD: Defendants Competence to Stand Trial
Affirmatively request a competency hearing within 10 days after the first appearance or it is waived.
Hearing must occur with 30 days of the request.
If successful, the defendant is institutionalized until they become competent.
MD: Defendants & Insanity
Every defendant is presumed sane.
If the defendant is competent to stand trial, the defendant can allege insanity.
MD: requesting an insanity plea
Affirmatively request a preliminary hearing within 10 days after the first appearance or it is waived.
Defendant must file written plea of not criminally liable (NCR).
Hearing must occur with 30 days of the request.
If successful, the defendant who is found guilty but NCR is committed until it is proven by a preponderance of the evidence that she is no longer a danger to herself or others.
Bail is generally available unless the defendant poses a flight risk or a danger to the community.
Presumption in favor of release pending trial and release after conviction pending appeal.
8th Amendment forbids setting of excessive bail, but does not require bail to be offered pending trial.
No explicit constitutional right to bail
Issuance/denial of bail must comport with due process.
The purpose of bail is to ensure the defendant comes to court.
Judge/court commissioner makes determination of bail, choosing to set bail, set no bail or release an individual on his own recognizance.
Major factors - flight risk and public safety.
Bail may be forfeited if conditions are not met, such as committing a crime, not showing up for court, or contacting the victim after being ordered not to do so.
MD: Process to modify/change bail
Writ of habeas corpus motion.
A guilty plea waives various trial rights, including the right to appeal.
To be valid, the defendant must knowingly and intelligently waive these rights.
Guilty plea is a critical stage, and the Defendant is entitled to have effective assistance of counsel.
(1) informs defendant of his rights and ensures that the defendant understand those rights,
(2) informs the defendant of the possible sentences,
(3) makes sure that there is a factual basis for the plea,
(4) determines that the plea did not result from improper force, threats or promises, and
(5) defendant understands immigration consequences of pleading guilty.
Failure of plea allocution allows the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea, and the trial may begin anew.
Right to Jury Trial
Right to jury trial for serious offenses where the authorized punishment is more than six months.
Defendant must ask for it.
Jury - Federal
Must have 12 members
Must decide the case unanimously.
Jury - States
States can use juries of 6 or more in criminal cases.
If 12 members, the jury does not need to be unanimous.
MD: Jury size
Venire/Jury Pool: a representation of a fair cross-section of the community from which no distinctive group is excluded. The jury is selected from this cross-section.
Voir Dire: the jury is narrowed down in the voir dire process. Potential jurors may be removed for cause or by peremptory challenge.
Jurors can be removed for cause when they reveal something that will prevent them from deliberating fairly or intelligently.
Knowledge, bias or relationship.
Disqualification of a juror for almost any reason, including hunches.
Each side is statutorily limited to three peremptory challenges.
Lawyers cannot challenge jurors on the basis of race or gender (Batson doctrine).
MD: Peremptory challenges
If sentence < 20 years, 4 peremptory challenges for each side.
If sentence > 20 years, 10 peremptory challenges for defendant, 5 for state.
Right to Speedy Trial: SOL
6th Amendment provides right to speedy trial.
Due Process/Statute of limitations gives defendants some protection. SOL starts to run when the crime is committed, but for continuing offenses, SOL does not start to run until the end of the crime/conspiracy.
Right to Speedy Trial: Timing
(1) length of delay,
(2) reason for delay,
(3) whether the defendant asserted his right to a speedy trial, and
(4) prejudice to the defendant.
MD: Right of Prompt Presentment
Defendants must be brought before a judicial officer of the district court within 24 hours of arrest.
MD: Hicks Rule
Trial date must be scheduled within 180 days unless good cause is shown.
Right to Public Trial
6th Amendment + 1st Amendment protect the rights of the defendant and the public to attend public trials.
Courts have some discretion to close particular proceedings if substantial likelihood of prejudice.
* Right to confront the witnesses against them
* Right to compulsory process to produce their own witnesses.
* Right to testify on his own behalf.
* Right to compulsory process to obtain witnesses in his defense.
If a hearsay statement is testimonial, then the 6th Amendment bars admission of a statement if (1) declarant is unavailable, and (2) defendant had no prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness.
A defendant's own statements are always admissible against him, even if the defendant does not testify at trial.
If co-defendants, a non-testifying co-defendants statements are not admissible against the co-defendant.
Burden of Proof
The prosecution must prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
The defendant has the burden of proof of affirmative defenses.
Result of Prosecutorial misconduct
May result in a mistrial or a reversal of a conviction.
Prosecutor must turn over all material exculpatory evidence to the defense, including evidence that tends to show that the defendant is not guilty of the crimes charged, and evidence that would enable the defense to impeach the credibility of prosecution witnesses.
Evidence is material if disclosure could change the outcome of the proceeding.
Brady material includes inconclusive lab reports, witness descriptions that do not match the defendant, cooperation with witnesses, and other things within the control of the government.
Prosecutors and False Testimony
A prosecutor may not knowingly present false testimony.
Prosecutors and Contact with Defendants
A prosecutor may not contact (or direct others to contact) a defendant outside the presence of his counsel.
Prosecutors and Defendant's Failure to Testify
A prosecutor cannot comment on the defendants failure to testify at trial or make unfair remarks about the defendant to the jury.
MD: Brady Duties
District court - provide discovery upon request.
Circuit court, the state must provide discovery within 30 days of the initial appearance or entry of counsel. The defendant is required to provide discovery within 30 days of the first trial date.
Required discovery - Prosecution
* State must provide statements of defendant or co-defendant, witness statements, police reports, expert opinions and criminal record of defendant or co-defendants.
* State must also provide information about any states witnesses, such as any impeachment information, such as wrongful conduct, untruthfulness, prior criminal record, pending charges or probationary status, relationship with the state, cooperation or favorable pleas, inconsistent statements or mental condition.
Required discovery for Defendant
30 days of trial
* The defendant must provide, without request, all witnesses who are going to show up in court.
6th Amendment right to counsel also guarantees defendants effective assistance of counsel.
Conflicts of Interest and Effective Counsel
Joint representation can pose problems for defendants because of the possibility of divided loyalty.
If actual conflict, the judge must warn the defendants of the risk. The judge can also decide not to allow the joint representation.
When a COI actually affects counsels behavior, there is a presumption of prejudice, and the defendant can obtain a new trial.
Effective Assistance: Strickland test
Assesses whether a defendant was denied effective assistance
Performance: did defense counsels performance fall below the wide range of objectively reasonable conduct that lawyers might engage in?
Prejudice: deficient performance prejudiced the defendant because there is a reasonable probability that, had counsel performed effectively, the result would have been different.
* Cases which go to trial: reasonable probability that defendant would not have been convicted if lawyer had done a proper job
* Guilty pleas: defendant must show that he would not have pleaded guilty if his lawyer had done a decent job not that an effective lawyer would have gotten a better plea deal.
Defendant's Choice of Counsel
The defendant who can afford retained counsel are entitled to the counsel of her choice as long as lawyer is (1) properly admitted in the jurisdiction, including pro hac vice, (2) available for trial and (3) no COI or other reason to disqualify the lawyer.
Violation of right to counsel is never harmless error.
Proceeding Pro Se
Defendants are entitled to waive the right to counsel and represent themselves.
A pro se defendant does not have a constitutional right to a back-up lawyer.
Length of Punishment - 8th Amendment
Government can impose a sentence of any length, except life without possibility of parole for minors who commit non-homicide crimes.
Death Penalty - 8th Amendment
Must be homicide.
Victim must die.
Can't be (1) defendant under 18 at time of commission, (2) mentally retarded defendants, or (3) insane defendants.
Cruel and Unusual Punishment - 8th Amendment
Cruel, excessive, or unusual/degrading punishments.
Must have been convicted of a crime.
May include failure to render medical treatment to defendants.
Double Jeopardy clause
Provides three separate doctrines
(1) against prosecution for the same offense after acquittal
(2) against prosecution for the same offense after conviction
(3) multiple prosecutions/punishments for the same offense.
If a crime requires proof of an element that the other does not, jeopardy attaches.
Offenses with different victims are separate offenses, and jeopardy will not attach.
Separate Sovereigns Rule
If two different sovereigns have jurisdiction over the crime committed, they can each try the defendant separate.
Jeopardy does not attach across jurisdictions.
When Jeopardy Attaches
Jeopardy attaches when a jury is sworn in, or in bench trials, when the judge is sworn in.
Prior to this, the prosecution can add, drop or change charges against the defendant without DJ issues.
Acquittal and DJ
If the jury acquits the defendant, it is the end of the case and the defendant cannot be retried by the same jurisdiction for the same offense.
Conviction and DJ
If the jury convicts the defendant, and he appeals and gets the convictions reversed, the defendant can be retried unless the reversal was based upon insufficiency of evidence.
Mistrial and DJ
If a mistrial is declared because of manifest necessity (deadlocked jury, defense counsel misconduct, judge sickness), defendant may be retried.
If mistrial declared without manifest necessity, defendant may not be retried by that jurisdiction.
A defendant is entitled to have the jury decide by proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, all of the elements to impose a particular criminal punishment.
Facts necessary to authorize a particular sentence must be found by the jury, and all facts to authorize a particular sentence must be found beyond a reasonable doubt.
Exception - sentence enhancement based on prior criminal convictions need not be charged in the case that results in the high sentence.
Motion for modification of sentence
within 90 days
Motion for new trial
10 days of conviction or 1 year of newly discovered evidence
Motion for Three Judge Panel Review of Sentence:
Only available if sentence is more than 2 years, and the panel excludes the sentencing judge. Judges can choose to keep the sentence, increase it or decrease it. Must be made 30 days of sentence.
Leave to file appeal
Post-conviction, a defendant is entitled to file one petition for post-conviction relief based on limited grounds, such as ineffective counsel. Must be filed within 10 years of conviction.
Writ of Actual Innocence:
Under certain circumstances notwithstanding the on year limitation applicable to a motion for a new trial, a defendant may file for a writ of actual innocence based on newly discovered evidence and require the court to conduct a hearing.