1L Torts: Negligence Causation

Card Set Information

Author:
jesdixon
ID:
54385
Filename:
1L Torts: Negligence Causation
Updated:
2011-08-30 18:14:43
Tags:
1L Torts Negligence Causation
Folders:

Description:
Torts: Negligence Causation
Show Answers:

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview

The flashcards below were created by user jesdixon on FreezingBlue Flashcards. What would you like to do?


  1. but for
    The injury would NOT have occurred but for the negligence of the D
  2. Loss of Chance
    Reduction in the chance of survival/opportunity (IE: failure to diagnose, child birth problems)

    NC does NOT recognize Loss of Chance;

    • Damages limited—awarded damages only caused directly by premature death (IE lost
    • earnings and additional medical expenses)

    • II)
    • Jury
    • determines cause if fact if there is a loss of chance in survival

    • III)
    • Doctrine has
    • not been extended beyond medical malpractice
  3. Substantial test factor
    • D’s act was a material or substantial factor in causing harm to P, they
    • are liable, even though either party’s act alone is sufficient to cause the
    • injury



    • I)
    • Separately
    • act negligent and either could cause injury
  4. Joint and several liability
    • two separate acts of negligence combine to create
    • a single, indivisible harm, both parties are liable even though each party’s
    • act alone did not cause it.

    2 sources of harm, both cause of injury-takes two to tango
  5. Summers
    • two joint acts of negligence but P cannot identify which D caused
    • injury…burden shifts to D to prove they were not responsible for harm
  6. Market Share liability
  7. Market Share Liability (percentages)—Each D is liable for
    • damages that is equivalent to its share of the market, unless it demonstrates that it could not have
    • been the cause of harm
  8. Direct-Cause—Polemis
    Injury caused by the act of D without any intervening causes

    liability for unforeseeable consequences

    P prefers this jurisdiction
  9. Reasonable foreseeability—Wagon Mound — NC
    No liability for unforeseeable consequences; if P's harm was reasonably foreseeable to the reasonable person at the time of the negligent act, proximate cause satisfied
  10. eggshell doctrine
    a defendant takes a plaintiff as he finds him.

    • Once a plaintiff sustains a foreseeable injury, even a trivial one, the defendant
    • is liable for all unforeseen physical, emotional, mental consequences injuries,
    • so long as they do not stem from superseding causes.
  11. Intervening Cause
    • Intervening Cause— any act between the D’s
    • negligence and the P’s ultimate harm.
  12. Superseding Cause
    • Superseding Cause—intervening cause that is
    • unforeseeable or independent of the D’s negligent act.

    ... breaks the chain of causation and severs liability to original negligent D.
  13. Types of superseding causes: Original negligent D not liable for:
    1. Usually criminal acts of 3rd persons

    2. Acts of god

    3. Intentional torts of 3rd persons
  14. Types of foreseeable intervening causes: original negligent D liable for:
    1. Subsequent medical malpractice

    2. Subsequent disease

    3. Subsequent Accident

    4. Attempt to escape danger creted by D

    5. Negligence of rescuer
  15. rescue doctrine
    • (1)
    • Rescue
    • Doctrine—Danger invites rescue.

    • Allows an injured rescuer to sue the party which caused the danger requiring the
    • rescue in the first place…. Allows a P to go to the jury to determine
    • negligence
  16. Rescue doctrine requirements:
    • 1. D was negligent to the person rescued
    • 2. peril/appearance of peril was immient
    • 3. reasonably prudent person would conclude peril existed
    • 4. rescuer acted with reasonable care

What would you like to do?

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview