PSY605 - Attention

Card Set Information

Author:
matthewjlpage
ID:
75565
Filename:
PSY605 - Attention
Updated:
2011-03-28 13:24:20
Tags:
Cognitive Neuroscience Attention
Folders:

Description:
Cognitive Neuroscience Attention
Show Answers:

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview

The flashcards below were created by user matthewjlpage on FreezingBlue Flashcards. What would you like to do?


  1. What is attention?
    A cognitive system that allows preferential processing of relevant information while ignroing irrelevant or distracting information.
  2. Three "particular ways" of attention
    • Alerting - dysfunction: anxiety
    • Orienting - dysfunction: depression
    • Monitoring - dysfunction: ADHD
  3. Fliud behaviore requires...
    • active interplay between internal and external stimuli
    • Internal: Somatic, affective, cognitive
    • External: Perception
  4. Alerting: Components
    • Vigilance - The ability to maintain alertness continuously over time (sustained attention)
    • Arousal - Tied to functioning of the autonomic nervous system - sympathetic)
    • Overall level of wakefulness
  5. Alerting: Paradigms/Techniques
    Galvanic skin response
  6. Alerting: Brain Regions
    • Reticular activating system
    • -Cell bodies in medulla & pons
    • -Projects diffusely throughout the cortex
  7. Alerting: Consequences
    • Hyperfunctioning: Panic and anxiety
    • Hypofunctioning: Unresponsive to dangerous stimuli
  8. Orienting: Components
    Select some information for further processing at the expense of selecting other information
  9. Orienting: Paradigms/Techniques
    Dichotic listening task (1940s)

    • -Listen to 2 streams of info
    • -Attend to one of the channels (i.e. left ear)
    • -Much of the message form the unattended channel is "not heard"
  10. Orienting: Components/Models
    • Select some information at the expense of selecting other information
    • Bottleneck view of information processing (Broadbent)
    • Attenuation theory (Treisman) - processing of unattended channel is diminshed (not absent) and increases when the info is relevant to the task
  11. Orienting: Paradigms/Techniques
    • Dichotic listening task
    • Shadowing experiments
  12. Information Processing: Early Selection
    Sensory Input

    • Perceptual Analysis
    • BOTTLENECK
    • Semantic Analysis

    Response Selection & Execution
  13. Information Processing: Late Selection
    Sensory Input

    Perceptual Analysis

    • Semantic AnalysisResponse
    • BOTTLENECK
    • Selection & Execution
  14. Cocktail Party Effect
    The ability to focus one's attention on a single speaker among a cacophony of conversation and background noise
  15. Treisman's Shadowing Study
    • Dichotic listening with two stories that switch ears in the middle
    • You stick to semantically consistent content
    • Supports early selection (?)
  16. Breakthrough Phenomenon
    • Items that easily pass through the unattend channel:
    • - Own name
    • - Words related to sex
    • - Curse words

    • Greater attenuation for neutral words relative to name
    • Evidence for late selection
  17. Evidence for Early vs. Late Selection
    • Early:
    • -Dichotic listening: Can't remember info from unattend channels
    • -Perceptual factors influence attentional cuing effects
    • -Attention influences the sensory-perceptual processing of information
    • -Attention's effect is seen early in time in the visual processing stream, in early visual areas (ERP studies)

    • Late:
    • -Breakthrough phenomenon
  18. Posner Cuing Paradigm
    • Covert attention
    • - Controls for perceptual input and eye movement

    Valid, invalid, and neutral trials
  19. Endogenous and Exogenous Attention
    • Endogenous: Must actively decide to put attention there
    • Exogenous: Stimulus draws attention itself
  20. Attentional Cuing Effect
    • Must do valid often enough for them to trust it (70% valid, 30% invalid)
    • Attentional benefits: | Neutral - Valid |
    • Attentional costs: | Neutral - Invalid |
  21. Posner Cuing Task - Luminance Manipulation
    • High Luminance - invalid RT is faster
    • Valid - luminance doesn't change RT (it is "maxed out")
    • So the cuing effect is greater during low relative to high luminance
  22. Single-Unit Studies of Attention
    • Impact of attention at cell's receptive field maximal at cell's selected orientation - Attention increases amplitude of cell's response
    • Increase in baseline firing when attention is paid to receptive field
    • So, baseline is shifted when attention is inside receptive field, as if that cell is getting ready
  23. Phasic activity vs. tonic activity
    • Phasic
    • -Evoked acitivity
    • -Stimulus must be preferred by cell
    • -Time lock to target
    • -Greater when target is attended

    • Tonic
    • -Sustained activity
    • -Location must be preferred by cell
    • -Time lock to cue
    • -Greater when attention is focused within cell's receptive field
  24. Problem with Cognitive Psych approach to Early/Late Selection Debate
    Is inormation really irrelevant if we need to response to it?

    Solution - Assessing the fate of unattended stimuli by measuring neural responses to them, which does not require judgment from the subject
  25. ERP Studies of Attention
    • Press button when two symbols are the same and on attended side
    • Electrode in right hemisphere, maximally sensitive to the left
    • P1 component has a greater amplitude when attention on left
  26. Summary of the P1
    • Generated in V4
    • It is a sensory-perceptual component
    • Its amplitude will be greater for brighter stimuli (regardless of attention conditions)
    • It if the first visually-evoked ERP component than is modulated by attention
    • Its amplitude is greater when attention is directed to the contralateral (versus ipsilateral) hemifield
    • Doesn't care about color (pink and green bars)
  27. N170
    • Face-sensitive component
    • Amplitude is greater as face saliency is greater
    • Amplitude is greater when attention is directed to face versus nonface stimuli (but this effect is limited to conditions during which the face saliency is low)
  28. Spatial location may be special
    All visual areas code for spatial location, in addition to another feature (orientation, color, motion, shape, face, etc.)
  29. The "Spotlight" Metaphor of Spatial Attention
    • Indivisible
    • Moves spatially from one region to the next
    • Enhances regions within the spotlight
    • Size of the region may vary but capacity is limited
    • Independent of eye-movement
  30. Components of Attentional Orienting
    • Disengage
    • Move
    • Engage
  31. Hemispatial Neglect
    • Failure to respond to objects or events presented in the contralesional hemifield
    • Lesions to the right parietal lobe (or frontal cortex, basal ganglia, or thalamus)
  32. Frames of Reference
    • Body-Center: anosagnosia, may include hemiplagia (inability to move one side of body)
    • Scene-based: Environment centered
    • Object-based: Object-centered
  33. Tasks used to index neglect
    • Line bisection
    • Target detection task
    • Copying
    • Spontaneous drawing
    • Matching
    • Implicit processing
    • Memory tasks
    • Posner cuing paradigm
  34. Target Detection Task
    • Dumbell, red side and green side -- is there an X in the red circle?
    • Spatial based vs. Object based
    • Object-based - still don't see X when rotated onto right side
  35. Will neglect influence memory for space?
    Memory is intact but reporting requires attention
  36. Extinction
    • Residual effects of neglect
    • Stimulus on left - It's there
    • Stimulus on right - It's there
    • Stimulus on both sides - Only see right, neglect left
  37. Disengage Deficit (Extinction) in Posner Cuing
    • Invalid - Faster ipsilateral to the lesion than contralateral
    • Valid - Same speed regardless of side

    With recovered patients, it's hard to disengage from right side cue to view left object (invalid)
  38. Balint's Syndrome
    • Severe attentional disorder; functionally blind
    • Ocular apraxia - Stare at a fixated object and have great difficulty disengaging
    • Simultagnosia - Can only perceive one object per fixation
    • Spatial disorientation - Can't perceive spatial layout of objects around them
    • Optic ataxia - inability to handle objects in space
    • Often have to close their eyes to fixate on another object
    • Bilateral parietal lesions
  39. Damage to Superior Colliculus
    • -Difficulty in "move" component of spatial attention
    • -Can't "keep steady" attention, and cuing doesn't help
    • -Unilateral damage

    • Posner Cuing
    • -Ipsilateral - slightly faster with valid, and faster than contralateral
    • -Contralateral - valid = invalid
  40. Damage to Pulvinar Nuclues of Thalamus
    • -Problem with "engage" component
    • -Can't engage in one object, and cuing doesn't help
    • -No problem selecting a single item when it is alone, but difficulty when multiple items present

    • Posner Cuing
    • -Ipsilateral - slightly faster with valid
    • -Contralateral - valid = invalid, and as fast as valid in ipsilateral
  41. Pink/Green Bars
    • P1 doesn't care about color - amplitude is same
    • P1 amplitude is greater for stimuli appearing on Left
    • Selection negativity is sensitive to color
    • Location-based selection precedes color-based selection
  42. Evidence suggesting spatial attention is special
    • ERP evidence: P1 for location occurs prior to SN for color
    • Illusory conjunctions: In the absence of spatial attention, object features are miscombined
  43. Illusory Conjunctions
    • 2THR3 --> 2THR3
    • Without focused attention, features appear to be combined at random
    • The miscombination of features form illusory objects in the absence of attention
  44. The Binding Problem
    Features are coded by separate systems

    • Know this from:
    • -Anatomical & Neurophysiological Evidence (modulatiry to visual system)
    • -Neuropsychological evidence (brain damage)
    • Brain imaging (fMRI and PET)

    • Problem: How do we experience a coherent world?
    • Solution: Feature Integration Theory
  45. Feature Integration Theory
    • Treisman
    • Attention is used to bind features together
    • Code one object at a time on the basis of its location
    • Bind together whatever features are at that location
  46. Coding, in Feature Integration Theory
    • Basic features - coded automatically, in parallel, without the need for spatial attention
    • Conjunction of features - need spatial attention
  47. Feature Search, in Feature Integration Theory
    • Parallel Search:
    • One feature - processed together, search is automatic without need for spatial attention, regardless of number of distractors
    • -Preattentive stage

    • Serial search:
    • Conjunction of features - Requires spatial attention to attend to each item until target is found, distractors increase reaction time
    • -Attentional stage

    Visual search experiments

What would you like to do?

Home > Flashcards > Print Preview