Standard supernatural argument for inclusive language
Premise 1: Language about God is analogical-that is, only some of the characteristics attached to the term on the human level apply to God
Premise 2: The use of "he," "his," and "Father" are especially misleading because it leads people (especially children) to assume wrongly that God is in some way more male than female
Premise 3: Moreover, since humans relate differently to members of the opposite gender, this false assumption is significant.
Conclusion: Thus, we should use language about God that transcends gender